N.S. judge convicts former Knowledge House CEO, lawyer of fraud

Brett Bundale, The Canadian Press</span>
Published Friday, March 9, 2018 9:14AM EST
Last Updated Friday, March 9, 2018 9:56AM EST

HALIFAX -- A Nova Scotia Supreme Court judge has found two key players in the dramatic collapse of a Halifax e-learning company guilty in a multi-million-dollar stock market fraud case.

Justice Kevin Coady released a 207-page ruling Friday convicting former Knowledge House Inc. president and CEO Daniel Potter and lawyer Blois Colpitts.

Knowledge House was once a high-flying developer of educational software, trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange before its breathtaking collapse in 2001.

In his decision, Coady said the defendants knowingly carried out fraudulent activities in a regulated securities market.

"Their goal was to artificially maintain the (Knowledge House) stock price while they secured new investors, who, as a result of the defendants' conduct, would be making investment decisions based on a misleading impression of the level of demand for the stock," he wrote.

"The defendants acted with an intent to defraud."

Coady said the defendants' actions spanned an 18-month period, which included the dot-com crash.

"During this time, the conspirators spent more than $11 million buying over 50 per cent of the (Knowledge House) shares that crossed the exchange," he wrote. "The defendants succeeded in artificially maintaining the share price."

While the judge found Potter and Colpitts guilty on all five counts of the indictment, he entered convictions only on the first two counts.

The trial began in November 2015 and heard from 75 witnesses over more than 150 court days, and 184 exhibits were received -- including thousands of documents.

A sentencing hearing was to take place later Friday.

Meanwhile, Coady also released a 54-page decision dismissing their charter application on the grounds of delays before and after they were charged, finding that their rights had not been infringed during the lengthy proceeding.

"The defendants in this case were not the victims of delay," he wrote in the decision. "Indeed, they went to great efforts throughout the entirety of this prosecution to create it."

Coady added: "It would be a miscarriage of justice to reward their efforts by staying the charges against them for delay."

Let's block ads! (Why?)